Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

June 13 2017

kanikani
06:10
8352 ba72
Reposted fromMilkyJoe MilkyJoe viawerhamster werhamster
06:09
1282 89bf

imin-loveanon:

aglassroseneverfades:

pmastamonkmonk:

schnerp:

feminism-is-radical:

auntiewanda:

brithwyr:

auntiewanda:

brithwyr:

auntiewanda:

houroftheanarchistwolf:

aawb:

starsapphire:

is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what

That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING

What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that?

It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot. 

image

It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for. 

I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..?

And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters. 

Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing.

We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine. 

What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do.

This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks: 

imageimageimage

Also: 

image

He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence.

You can see her butthole for chrissakes

I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers.

Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity.

Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs.

Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock.

Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE.

This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you.

@angstymelon

Reposted fromwritingfish writingfish viawerhamster werhamster
06:01
06:01
7880 2808

untexting:

gifsboom:

Little Duck Feeding The Fish.

this is amazing

Reposted fromclocktown clocktown viakokoloko kokoloko
kanikani
06:01
Reposted fromt2k t2k viakokoloko kokoloko
kanikani
05:56
05:55
3898 9dc1
Reposted frommaswartz maswartz vianoisetales noisetales
05:54
3194 ceaf
kanikani
05:54
Spongecreep
Reposted fromjagger jagger vianoisetales noisetales
kanikani
05:49
Reposted fromkaiee kaiee viawerhamster werhamster
kanikani
05:43
9604 65f8 500
Reposted fromMiziou Miziou viacarlandlouise carlandlouise
05:43
7825 58ea 500
Reposted fromfleursdemal fleursdemal viawerhamster werhamster
05:43

itsfunnytomemke:

airoe:

why is broccoli seen as this universally hated vegetable. broccoli is delicious

Reposted fromtron tron viawerhamster werhamster
kanikani
05:41
4287 0112 500
Reposted fromTenSigis TenSigis viadobry dobry
05:41
8120 bbb2 500

unfollovving:

mgs3:

полосатая сосисочка

Reposted fromprincesaix princesaix viaIMS IMS

June 12 2017

05:05
8727 3963

uppityfemale:

I say this every time I argue for raising the minimum wage. I never hear anyone else say it and I’m glad I found this.

If you build your business and your bonus on the backs of others who you don’t pay a living wage you don’t deserve to be in business.

Reposted fromvivialopod vivialopod viaIMS IMS

June 11 2017

kanikani
11:26
Reposted fromFlau Flau
11:25
3604 b5b4 500

lukia26:

jncera:

furbearingbrick:

jncera:

avondale, arizona just added a drug-sniffing bearded dragon to their police force and the best part his name is OFFICER IROH

[source for full story]

oh my god i thought this was clickbait but its fucking real

welcome to arizona

IROH

THE DRAGON OF THE WEST

Reposted fromamusingmurff amusingmurff
kanikani
11:04
kanikani
11:01
4308 c194 500
Reposted frommisterpeter misterpeter
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl